logo

Words of a Fether

Opinions on Faith and Life

Does God Really Care?

Many years ago I blogged about a rebuttal to the book When Bad Things Happen to Good People. It addressed the issue of how a good and loving God could allow terrible suffering in this life. And the basic answer was that this life is not the only life, such that there is only injustice if God never pays people back in the next life. But as I also discussed in a recent post, Holding Satan’s Leash, what God allows in this life depends on much more than we may think. There is a cosmic battle going on, and the rules of the battle involve God not violating human free will.

The reason I’m bringing this up again is because of a book that was published recently, This Little Light. People have always done great evil in the names of their gods, but what this book does is show that not all that glitters is gold, or as Tozer said, not all that breathes the name of Jesus and comes wearing the cloak of Christianity is genuine. The way is narrow and few find it, but it seems that this has been forgotten by the multitudes that throng to the churches each week, and the clergy who either violate and destroy people or the ones who enable and cover for it.

That’s also why I’m so against The Institution, the thing that legitimizes control and power between believers. Regardless of the size of the congregation or where it meets, the real issue is the hierarchy, the clergy/laity class distinction. I fight this every day online, and most professing Christians lash back with hatred. They talk about how beautiful it is, how all those theologians can’t be wrong, how 2,000 years of church history can’t be lying to us. Then they tell me how rebellious I am, how antinomian, how conceited, and that I shouldn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.

But I wonder how Calvinists justify their view of God in the light of this book’s testimony? The Calvinistic view teaches that God, by decreeing everything, turns a blind eye to most suffering (because, as they teach, He hates the non-elect— but apparently the elect don’t fare any better in many cases), and this book confirms it. Many victims of clergy abuse have had seared into their souls a connection between faith talk and unspeakable suffering, and take the words God loves you as a stab in the heart since He allegedly had some good purpose in, for example, allowing a pastor to repeatedly rape and abuse a child. What possible purpose could there be in that, even if the perpetrator winds up in hell (as also the non-elect victim will!)?

Rather, we should remember that the world is in the hands of the god of this age (2 Cor. 4:4, Gal. 1:4) and then thank God that anything good ever happens. We who learn of this abuse are also being tested: do we bend over backwards to help the victims, or do we punish them by blaming them and making excuses for their abusers? What kind of God do we represent to them? Do we exhibit this love and justice? Remember that Jesus said we’ll all be judged according to the measure we used for others (Mt. 7:2). If you blame victims and excuse criminals, God will do the same to you on Judgment Day.

Which brings up another point: God is perfectly justified in sending evildoers to eternal hell. How could He be just or loving otherwise? Those who teach universalism and say that a loving God couldn’t do this are saying they care nothing for justice for the victims, that God loves perpetrators more. No wonder Paul said that if this life is the only life, we Christians are the most pitiful for believing a lie (1 Cor. 15:19)!

And surely God can be trusted to discern whether an unbeliever ever had a legitimate chance to hear and respond to the gospel. Is He not merciful? Does He really care more about the sparrow that falls to the ground (Mt. 10:29) than a divine decree in eternity past? Yes, as I’ve argued many times, an adult of sound mind must hear and respond to the gospel in order to be saved. But I think we are playing God to coldly consign to hell someone who was horribly abused and cannot respond to the gospel. Are they really in their right mind, any more than someone who was abused while hearing the music of Beethoven is in their right mind if they become afraid or ill at the mere sound of that music? There is surely a huge gap between the person who decides rationally to reject the gospel message, and the person who is unable to decide rationally.

We Christians need to understand that this world at present is under the control of Satan, though that control is bounded and temporary. Satan must think he can ultimately win by one method or another, one of them being that God will not be able to withhold help to victims of terrible suffering and thus violate free will and Satan’s current control of the world. We have to stop promising physical deliverance in this life and remember that the kingdom of God is not of this world (John 18:36).

An added bonus of this teaching is that we have an answer for why we thank God when good things happen. Many scoffers say, Good things happen to atheists too, so why should anyone think God answered your prayers? We can rightfully thank God for any and every good thing that happens, whether the direct result of prayer or not, since it is yet another instance where He outsmarted Satan and is beating him at his own game. The atheist has no one to thank, and no explanation for the concept of justice since they know very well that many crimes go unsolved.*

We may not be able to say anything that would help or soothe these victims of severe abuse, but we must be careful about the implications of what we say to the lost. Empty platitudes and shallow catchphrases only work among the comfortable. Think through to the logical conclusions of your beliefs, and be prepared to give answers (1 Peter 3:15) that accurately reflect the reality of this life and the next. It is not hateful to tell the truth and it is not loving to withhold it. Understand why God allows suffering, and what our hope is grounded in. Grapple with these questions instead of those silly devotional guides that only help you and not the suffering.


* Karma fares no better; it always blames the victim and tells them to do better next time, even though they can’t remember a thing from their alleged former life! And Hindu-type meditation, which they claim helps not only the practitioners but the whole world, has a dismal track record for the latter. One would expect India to be a veritable paradise with all those people meditating for thousands of years, but as a group they have fared worse than the unenlightened countries, especially those that have had a large Judeo-Christian influence.

Posted 2010-10-15 under Calvinism, behavior, God, women, control, hierarchy, misogyny, egalitarian, abuse